Sunday, February 20, 2011

Spreading the Wisconsin Struggle

Lessons for Wisconsin From the Flint Sit Down Strikes of 1936-37
Dr Mark Naison
Fordham University
   With the state legislature in Wisconsion occupied and surrounded by thousands of state workers and their supporters, and with schools closed throughout the state because of teachers calling in sick, I cannot help but think of the greatest strike and building occupation in the history of the American labor movement- the Flint Sit Down Strikes of 1936-37.  Though the Wisconsin struggle is being led by government workers, and the Flint Strikes involved workers involved in automobile production, both movements took place during the worst economic crisis of their era and were fighting for the same goal- collective bargaining rights for working people through a union of their own choosing- and were much more about dignity and respect than about income.   
      The Flint Strike, which involved the occupation of 9 General Motors automobile plants over a  six week period, transformed the history of the industrial labor movement.  During December of 1936, when the first GM plant was seized and occupied, the entire automobile and steel industries in the United States were union free. When the strike was finally settled, both General Motors and United States Steel agreed to bargain collectively with the CIO ( Congress of Industrial Organizations) unions seeking to organize their industries.   
      The Flint Strike , though it was precipitated by local conditions- a fierce unrelenting speed up on the GM assembly line , the involvement of a Ku Klux Klan like organization called the Black Legion in suppressing labor unrest in GM plants- was part of a national movement to win bargaining rights for industrial workers. As a result, the Flint workers were supported by the national leadership of the CIO-led by the formidable John L Lewis- as well as their own national union, and numerous leftwing organizations including the Communist Party.  Though only GM workers actually occupied the factories, at key points in the strike, thousands of union workers  were mobilized to come down from other cities to make sure that right wing Citizens Committees were unable to storm the plants, and that food and medical supplies were delivered to the striking workers.  There were also doctors, nurses, lawyers, and journalists who came from all over the country to help the strikers.    By the second week of the sit-down strikes, it was clear to everyone involved that this had become a truly national movement
    The same dynamic must operate if the Wisconsin movement is to achieve its main goal- removal from the governor’s legislative program of any effort to weaken the bargaining rights of public workers in the state.  Unions around the nation who face similar initiatives ( in Ohio, Tennessee and New Jersey) must send delegations to join the occupation and the protests and give whatever financial and legal support is necessary to teachers who are keeping the local schools closed.  National union leaders who have a high public profile, people like Richard Trumka and Randy Weingarten, must not only come to Madison to offer their support of the movement, they must head straight to the White House to demand that President Obama and Democratic Congressional leaders come out aggressively in support of the Madison movement. Student social justice organizations must send delegations to Madison to join the thousands of students at the state’s public universities who have been a central part of this movement from the beginning.

  This movement has to be approached as the single most important labor struggle in the United States in the 21st Century. If the governor destroys collective bargaining for public workers in Wisconsin, you can be sure that similar initiatives will succeed in other states. If he
Is forced to take attacks on collective bargaining off the table by the strength of the protest,  it will reinvigorate not only the entire labor movement in the United States, but the movement  to prevent Congress and state legislatures from destroying what little of a safety net we have in the United States of America
 The stakes could not be higher. So if you are in a union or part of a progressive  organization, press your leadership to send people to Wisconsin. Insist your elected representatives pass resolutions in support of the Wisconsin movement.  And get ready to fight the same battle in your own state when the time comes
Solidarity Foreover!
Mark Naison
February 18, 2011

Mark Naison is a labor historian

1 comment:

whitecollargreenspaceguy said...

No Cost Budget Alternative Would Save $2 Billion per Year and Stop the Attack on Wisconsin Employee Benefits
No Cost plan to solve state & federal budget deficit will also Greatly Reduce Pollution, Reduce America's Dependence on Oil, Reduce Offshore Drilling & Reduce overhead costs for gov & business:

The next big thing in government - using tech to save the budget. Wisconsin, other states and Congress could use this simple plan to cut back on cost of office space instead of furloughs and shutdowns and large pay cuts.

We can no longer afford to let all white-collar workers that still have jobs work banker's hours when we can work two shifts per day in government and private industry and cut our overhead costs in half. This simple paradigm shifts solves three problems: It jumpstarts economy and fights poverty, cuts pollution, reduces budget deficits.
Most office space is very expensive yet white collar workers only us it 40 hours per week even though we pay for 168 hours per month (7 days times 24 hours). Office space costs up to $50,000 per year for each employee yet we only use space 30% of time. 30% efficiency is completely unacceptable in today's economic and ecological environment. This could be one answer to the health care mess, global warming which actually should be called over-pollution, unemployment, empty buildings and state budget shortfalls. In Wisconsin this plan could save at least $10,000 per employee times 175,000 state employees. The would add up to almost $2 billion per year. With over 2 million employees, the federal government could save over $20 billon per year with very little up from costs

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.