Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Dolores Huerta receives Presidential Medal of Freedom
Watch Dolores Huerta Calls Herself 'a Born-Again Feminist' on PBS. See more from PBS NewsHour.
Dolores Huerta is an Honorary Chair of DSA.
Dolores Huerta is an Honorary Chair of DSA.
Labels:
Dolores Huerta,
DSA,
Medal of Freedom,
President Obama,
UFW
Monday, May 28, 2012
Sunday, May 27, 2012
The long march for equal opportunity in education
The long march
through the institutions has ended for the Bilingual /Multicultural faculty and
students at CSU Sacramento. On
Sat, May 19, the Bilingual/Multicultural Education Department at CSU-Sacramento
graduated its final class. A
movement that began in the Mexican
American Education Project of 1969-1974 came to a close. See history here:
I retired in
2008 and had little role to play in the decision to abandon this civil rights project. In the 15 year history of the
department we graduated thousands of new bilingual teachers and educational
leaders who, under the prior hegemonic system, would have been sorted out. These graduates have gone into teaching
and schools and influenced thousands of students. Under the new
system, they will again often be discarded. The drop out rate for Chicano
students remains near 50%.
The students are still there. The students of California still need bilingual and multicultural
teachers. Students who are
descendents of Mexican and Chicano families now make up almost 48% of public
school students.
There were budget cuts, but a united faculty could have
retained the department if they so chose.
Instead, a new generation of faculty chose to abandon this institutional
base that had been created by their predecessors.
For more history see; https://sites.google.com/site/democracyandeducationorg/chicano-mexican-american-digital-history-project/history-of-bilingual-education-dept-at-sac-state
An injury to one is an injury to all.
This post dedicated to the memory of Hugo Chacon and Dr. Tom
Carter.
Friday, May 25, 2012
DSA voter recommendations
Sacramento Progressive Alliance.
May, 2012- Adopted
Note; the ballot is complex. Please read it in advance.
U.S.
President
|
|
Democrat
|
U.S.
Senate
|
Dianne
Feinstein
|
Democrat
|
U.S.
Congress District 7
|
Ami Bera
|
Democrat
|
District 3
|
John
Garamendi
|
Democrat
|
District 10
|
Jose
Hernandez
|
Democrat
|
Ballot
Initi Prop 28
|
Yes
|
|
Proposition
29
|
Yes
|
|
Assembly
district 8
|
Ken Cooley
|
Democrat
|
Assembly
district 9
|
Richard
Pan
|
Democrat
|
Sacramento
City council 6
|
Kevin
McCarty
|
Democrat
|
Sacto City
council 8
|
Bonnie
Pannel
|
|
Sacto City
Council 2
|
Rob Kerth
|
|
Sacramento
County Supervisor
|
Gary
Blenner
Jeff
Kravitz District 3
|
Occupy
|
Twin
Rivers School Board
|
Area 3
|
Walter
Kawamoto
|
Sacramento
Board of Education
|
Area
3. Edith Crawford
Area 7 Harold Fong
|
|
|
Area 4
Estelle Lemieux
|
|
Sacramento
Democratic Central Committee
|
District 5
|
Michael A
Piña
|
Placer
County
|
Democratic
Central C.
|
Phil Kim
|
Yolo
County Supervisor
|
Arturo
Pimentel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Glen Ford: Corporate Assault on Public Education
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdPACwRgw04
In the space of less than 20 years,
the public school privatization movement has emerged from the narrow, right
wing fringes to dominate both major political parties. From vouchers to school
choice to charter schools, the issue has divided even Black Americans, who were
once public education's most fervent supporters. Glen Ford explains how this
came about by wealthy individuals buying black politicians and promoting their
careers, particularly Corey Booker.
Glen Ford is a veteran of more than
40 years in broadcast, print and Internet journalism. A former Washington
Bureau Chief and White House, Capitol Hill, and State Department correspondent,
he is currently Executive Editor of Black Agenda Report
(BlackAgendaReport.com), a weekly magazine of news, commentary and analysis
from the Black Left. Along with co-host Nellie Hester Bailey, Ford hosts and
produces the weekly, one-hour Black Agenda Radio program on the Progressive
Radio Network.
Sponsored by LifeLines and Peace
and Justice Task Force of All Souls Church. Event May 9, 2012 Camera, sound Joe
Friendly
Monday, May 21, 2012
Billionaire donors drive anti-teacher, pro-testing education reform agenda
Labels:
Billionaires,
fake school reform,
testing
188 California School districts in financial trouble
State Schools Chief Tom Torlakson Reports Record
Number of School Districts in Financial Jeopardy
SACRAMENTO—State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson warned today that 2.6 million California children now attend schools in districts that are in financial jeopardy—the highest number of financially troubled districts in state history.
"This is the kind of record no one wants to set. Across California, parents, teachers, and administrators are increasingly wondering how to keep their schools' lights on, their bills paid, and their doors open," Torlakson said. "The deep cuts this budget crisis has forced—and the uncertainties about what lies ahead—are taking an unprecedented and unacceptable toll on our schools."
The state's Second Interim Status Report for 2011-12 also shows a record-high 188 local educational agencies (LEAs) are either in negative or qualified financial status. That's up 61 LEAs from the First Interim Status Report for 2011-12 issued in February, and up 45 from the Second Interim Report for 2010-11 issued a year ago.
The Sacramento Bee, on the other hand, thinks that the problem is teacher quality. There is little evidence to support the Bee's position.
Labels:
California,
financial crisis,
School districts,
Torlakson
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Bee editorial - New Pressure for Teacher Quality
The Sacramento Bee editors on May 20, issued another of their pronouncements on schools in an essay titled, "New Pressure for Teacher Quality,"
That the Bee editorial writers and Pia Lopez endorse the lobbying group that calls itself students first is not a surprise. They have long been in this camp which ignores the reality of classrooms. You can choose to follow the lead of the politicians, the Bee Editorial Board, and even "Democrats for School Reform," or you can choose to seek to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The Politicians, including our Democratic Leaders, argue about laws such as those listed. At the same time, these politicians vote to cut the funds of schools by $1,000 per student. That is some $32,000 per classroom. Politicians and fake school reformers argue that their laws will make a difference. Yet, the cuts in school funding make more of a negative difference. The politicians, and the Bee Editorial Board has abandoned the schools in favor of a gimmick and a headline. Where are the leaders of our state? See reports on who funds these "leaders" at the Democracy and Education Institute site.http://sites.google.com/site/democracyandeducationorg/
As noted below:
Common core standards is what the politicians talk about while cutting school budgets. Such standards do not teach a single student. Similarly "teacher quality" is what the funded advocates talk about. They don't work in schools and they don't improve schools.
Two interesting essays there on the funding of school "reform" advocates.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/20/4500778/new-pressure-for-teacher-quality.html#storylink=cpy
That the Bee editorial writers and Pia Lopez endorse the lobbying group that calls itself students first is not a surprise. They have long been in this camp which ignores the reality of classrooms. You can choose to follow the lead of the politicians, the Bee Editorial Board, and even "Democrats for School Reform," or you can choose to seek to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The Politicians, including our Democratic Leaders, argue about laws such as those listed. At the same time, these politicians vote to cut the funds of schools by $1,000 per student. That is some $32,000 per classroom. Politicians and fake school reformers argue that their laws will make a difference. Yet, the cuts in school funding make more of a negative difference. The politicians, and the Bee Editorial Board has abandoned the schools in favor of a gimmick and a headline. Where are the leaders of our state? See reports on who funds these "leaders" at the Democracy and Education Institute site.http://sites.google.com/site/democracyandeducationorg/
As noted below:
Common core standards is what the politicians talk about while cutting school budgets. Such standards do not teach a single student. Similarly "teacher quality" is what the funded advocates talk about. They don't work in schools and they don't improve schools.
Two interesting essays there on the funding of school "reform" advocates.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/20/4500778/new-pressure-for-teacher-quality.html#storylink=cpy
Labels:
Sacramento Bee,
school reform,
teachers
The Creativity Conundrum in Education Leadership
Rsolyn Tam.
Many of the men and
women who shaped the world over the course of history, from Mozart to Albert
Einstein to Steve Jobs, have done so by thinking well outside the sphere of
traditional education. Famously, each of these men had some issues with
authority, and it’s hard to imagine any of them sitting placidly in a classroom
and copying facts and figures from a chalkboard. In the end, their genius was
not simply in their ability to understand complex systems, although that was
certainly an important part of it. What set them apart was their
creativity—that is, their ability to use previously held knowledge to produce
something that no one had ever thought to make before; whether a symphony, a
scientific theory or a personal computer.
The passing of Steve
Jobs in 2011 rekindled an age-old discussion about the relationship of
creativity and innovation to traditional notions of intelligence.
(Jobs often credited the creative classes he audited after dropping out of
college with influencing some of his later decisions at Apple.) Not
everything about this relationship is completely understood, but most people
involved in education and public policy agree: creativity will be a crucial
characteristic possessed by anyone hoping to succeed in the
twenty-first-century economy. And yet, the education system in its current
state is not set up to foster this sort of out-of-the-box thinking. One
solution currently gaining momentum is the use of community-driven non-profit
organizations known as local education funds (LEFs) and public education funds
(PEFs), which are committed to improving access to quality education for all
members of society. While not the complete answer, these reform-minded
organizations might be the key to injecting creativity back into public
schools.
Fostering Creative
Intelligence in the American Classroom
It is ten years
after the passage of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, which was enacted in
order to help American schools compete with their foreign counterparts, and
their foreign counterparts are still
outscoring them in just about every subject. This might be partially
due to NCLB’s use of standardized testing to measure school performance. As
many teachers will attest
to, this emphasis on test scores leave schools little room
to focus on anything besides “teaching to the test.” The United States has gone
backwards, then, to a so-called “drill-and-kill” system of rote learning and
memorization, while many of the rest of the world’s schools, especially those
in Europe and Asia, have evolved to place emphasis on big picture concepts,
problem solving, and encouraging innovation.
According to a 2010 study
by The College of William & Mary education professor Kyung-Hee Kim,
creativity has been on the decline among American students since 1990. Using
the results of the Torrance Test
measuring creative thinking, she analyzed decades’ worth of data and found
that, while traditional IQ scores have actually gone up steadily each decade,
creativity is on the decline. She also used the results to identify three types
of students: those with high intelligence and high creativity, those with high
intelligence and low creativity, and those with low intelligence and high
creativity. What does this tell us? One theory is that creativity and intelligence,
while related, are not exactly the same thing, and placing too much stress on
more traditional standards of intelligence might result in stifling creativity
in those who possess that quality. As Kim notes, “If we neglect creative
students in school because of the structure and the testing movement—creative
students cannot breathe, they are suffocated in school—then they become
underachievers.” While there are several factors that might be resulting in
this “creativity
crisis,” Kim puts
at least some of the blame for lower Torrance test scores on the culture of
standardized testing encouraged by NCLB.
This decline in
creativity does not bode well for the future of the country. According to John
M. Eger, professor of communications and public policy and director of the Creative
Economy Initiative at San Diego State University, creativity is essential to
building an economy to compete with the rest of the world in coming decades. In
a Huffington Post article
from 2011, Eger points out that, while the word “creative” is often associated
with the arts, the concept of creativity is just as important for the STEM subjects that have received so much
attention from education leaders and government officials in recent years. In
fact, a recent IBM poll
of 1,500 CEOs around the world identified creativity as the top quality needed
for future success in the global economy.
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Common Core Standards- David Coleman
Backer of Common Core
School Curriculum Is Chosen to Lead College Board
By Tamar Lewin : New
York Times
David Coleman, an architect of the common
core curriculum standards that are being adopted in nearly all 50 states, will
become the president of the College Board,
starting in October.
Editors
note: Common core standards is what the politicians talk about while cutting
school budgets. Such standards do
not teach a single student.
“There’s no reason on earth for common core standards and these tests that we’re wasting billions of dollars on,” said Stephen Krashen, an emeritus education professor at the University of Southern California. “The problem is poverty, poverty, poverty. Middle-class children who go to well-funded schools do very well, but even the best tests, the most inspiring teachers, won’t mean anything if the kids don’t have enough to eat.”
Robert Reich: Public vs. Private Morality
Labels:
capitalism,
economic crisis,
economic power,
morality,
Robert Reich
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
CDE says NCLB not working in California
California Seeks State-Defined Waiver to Provide Relief
From Unworkable Mandates of 'No Child Left Behind'
SACRAMENTO—The State Board of Education (SBE) today voted to seek a state-defined waiver (DOC) of selected provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which would allow the state to use its accountability system to focus improvement efforts on the lowest performing schools and provide schools greater flexibility over the use of federal funds.
On behalf of all California school districts, SBE President Michael Kirst and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson will ask the U.S. Department of Education to set aside select requirements of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), which inaccurately labels too many schools as failing. The request would allow California to use its own accountability system to ensure that all schools are held accountable for improving learning outcomes for all students.
California's request differs from those filed by other states in response to an invitation extended by the U.S. Department of Education to each state to request flexibility from certain provisions of ESEA in exchange for specified policies to improve student learning and increase the quality of instruction. State officials thoroughly considered the federal waiver proposal, but opted to craft a state-defined waiver request because California's budget challenges and mandate reimbursement laws make it impossible to comply with the wide-ranging new requirements of the federal waiver package.
"It's time to leave behind No Child Left Behind," Torlakson said. "This request capitalizes on our strengths—our well-established accountability system. It also provides school districts an opportunity to get the relief they deserve now, and the flexibility they need to direct limited funds where they will do the most good."
Labels:
Ca.Dept. of Education,
California,
failure,
NCLB,
Torlakson,
Waivers
Monday, May 14, 2012
California budget takes from schools to pay for corporate tax evasion
Budget May Revise.
The proposed California budget for next year says that income will be $15.7 billion less than expected.
The report is here.
http://www.dof.ca.gov/documents/2012-13_May_Revision.pdf
California does not have enough money to continue the
funding of schools, universities, fire and safety, and social services at their present levels. The Republican Party has consistently
refused to raise taxes. So, the
Republican legislative blocking
has forced the following cuts:
MediCal, child care, Cal Works, Nursing homes, In Home
Supportive Services, Cal Grants ( college tuition), and a forced employee pay
cuts (5%) – such as a 4 day work week.
These cuts are from the current budget. The May Revision provides level
funding for k-12 schools.
If the tax proposals are not passed in November, there will
be an additional $5.6 billion dollars
cut from K-12 schools. These are called trigger cuts. They will be automatic if the
initiative is not passed.
These draconian cuts are imposed because the state will not-
or can not – deal with corporate tax evasions. We know of $10 billion in tax evasions from Apple, and there
probably is a similar tax evasion by Google, Yahoo, and other internet
companies.
California is Not Broke , but corporate tax subsidies
are destroying our schools.
We suffer from two problems: a huge concentration of income
at the very top of the income distribution and a tax system that fails to
tax that concentration. Our tax system asks those with less to
pay more and those with more to pay less.
Wednesday, May 09, 2012
What you need to know about ALEC
by Diane Ravitch
Since the 2010 elections, when Republicans took control of many states, there has been an explosion of legislation advancing privatization of public schools and stripping teachers of job protections and collective bargaining rights. Even some Democratic governors, seeing the strong rightward drift of our politics, have jumped on the right-wing bandwagon, seeking to remove any protection for academic freedom from public school teachers.
This outburst of anti-public school, anti-teacher legislation is no accident. It is the work of a shadowy group called the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC. Founded in 1973, ALEC is an organization of nearly 2,000 conservative state legislators. Its hallmark is promotion of privatization and corporate interests in every sphere, not only education, but healthcare, the environment, the economy, voting laws, public safety, etc. It drafts model legislation that conservative legislators take back to their states and introduce as their own "reform" ideas. ALEC is the guiding force behind state-level efforts to privatize public education and to turn teachers into at-will employees who may be fired for any reason. The ALEC agenda is today the "reform" agenda for education.
ALEC operated largely in the dark for years, but gained notoriety because of the Trayvon Martin case in Florida. It turns out that ALEC crafted the "Stand Your Ground" legislation that empowered George Zimmerman to kill an unarmed teenager with the defense that he (the shooter) felt threatened. When the bright light of publicity was shone on ALEC, a number of corporate sponsors dropped out, including McDonald's, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Mars, Wendy's, Intuit, Kaplan, and PepsiCo. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation said that it would not halt its current grant to ALEC, but pledged not to provide new funding. ALEC has some 300 corporate sponsors, including Walmart, the Koch Brothers, and AT&T, so there's still quite a lot of corporate support for its free-market policies. ALEC claimed that it is the victim of a campaign of intimidation.
Since the 2010 elections, when Republicans took control of many states, there has been an explosion of legislation advancing privatization of public schools and stripping teachers of job protections and collective bargaining rights. Even some Democratic governors, seeing the strong rightward drift of our politics, have jumped on the right-wing bandwagon, seeking to remove any protection for academic freedom from public school teachers.
This outburst of anti-public school, anti-teacher legislation is no accident. It is the work of a shadowy group called the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC. Founded in 1973, ALEC is an organization of nearly 2,000 conservative state legislators. Its hallmark is promotion of privatization and corporate interests in every sphere, not only education, but healthcare, the environment, the economy, voting laws, public safety, etc. It drafts model legislation that conservative legislators take back to their states and introduce as their own "reform" ideas. ALEC is the guiding force behind state-level efforts to privatize public education and to turn teachers into at-will employees who may be fired for any reason. The ALEC agenda is today the "reform" agenda for education.
ALEC operated largely in the dark for years, but gained notoriety because of the Trayvon Martin case in Florida. It turns out that ALEC crafted the "Stand Your Ground" legislation that empowered George Zimmerman to kill an unarmed teenager with the defense that he (the shooter) felt threatened. When the bright light of publicity was shone on ALEC, a number of corporate sponsors dropped out, including McDonald's, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Mars, Wendy's, Intuit, Kaplan, and PepsiCo. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation said that it would not halt its current grant to ALEC, but pledged not to provide new funding. ALEC has some 300 corporate sponsors, including Walmart, the Koch Brothers, and AT&T, so there's still quite a lot of corporate support for its free-market policies. ALEC claimed that it is the victim of a campaign of intimidation.
Labels:
ALEC,
charter schools,
Diane Ravitch,
school reform
Monday, May 07, 2012
Teacher Performance Testing - PACT
There is a New York Times article today about
Resistance to Outsourcing Teacher Licensing. Move to Outsource Teacher Licensing Process Draws Protest
... Student teachers
at the University of Massachusetts are protesting a new national licensure
procedure being developed by the education ...
May 6, 2012 - By MICHAEL WINERIP - Education - Article -
Print Headline: "Move to Outsource Teacher Licensing Process Draws
Protest"
A group of faculty and students at UMASS Amherst are
resisting the assessment system developed and used in California, known as
PACT. In the article Prof. Raymond Pecheone of Stanford and others claim there
is no organized resistance to this testing.
To the contrary.
A group of faculty and students in the CSU have consistently resisted
this testing as invalid and not reliable.
Here is a record of some of this resistance.
Duane Campbell.
Democracy and Education Institute.
Labels:
Darling-Hammond,
New York Times,
PACT,
Pecheone,
Stanford
Sunday, May 06, 2012
Faces of Hunger- State Capitol
faces of hunger
photographs of hunger in alameda county
by david bacon
california state capitol
hallway in front of the governor's office
sacramento, ca
starting may 8, 2012
reception 10am, may 8, in the governor's council room
Labels:
California,
David Bacon,
hunger,
photos
Saturday, May 05, 2012
Plutocracy, Paralysis, and the Great Depression
“Specifically, money buys power, and the increasing wealth
of a tiny minority has effectively bought the allegiance of one of our two
major political parties , in the process destroying any prospect for
cooperation.
And the takeover of half our political spectrum by the 0.01
percent is, I’d argue, also responsible for the degradation of our economic
discourse, which has made any sensible discussion of what we should be doing
impossible.
All the evidence points, however, points to a simple lack of
demand, which could be and should be cured very quickly through a combination
of fiscal and monetary stimulus.
No, the real structural problem is in the political system,
which has been warped and paralyzed by the power of a small, wealthy
minority. And the key to economic
recovery lies in finding a way to get past that minority’s malign influence. “ Paul Krugman. May 4,2012.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/opinion/krugman-plutocracy-paralysis-perplexity.html?_r=1
Labels:
1 %,
economic crisis,
Paul Krugman,
plutocracy,
political paralysis,
rich
Friday, May 04, 2012
Here come more cuts
California fell almost $2 billion below estimates in
personal income taxes paid in April.
The Legislative Analyst Office says that the state is some $3.5 billion
behind the state forecasts for this year which are the basis for the current
budget. Thus, the legislature will again face
cuts. More cuts to schools, more
cuts to social services, health care,
child support, police and fire protection.
This
approach to economics is called austerity. It doesn’t work. Austerity is being tried in Greece, Italy, Spain, Great Britain, and Ireland, among others. It does not work. Austerity makes the economy worse – and thus further reductions of tax
receipts and further cuts.
The economic crisis of 2007 to the
present made matters worse. The
state took in some $30 billion less in taxes and thus had less to send to the
schools. School budgets have been
cut by some $10 billion. K-12
education receives about 40% of the California budget. Thus any decline in the state budget
leads directly to cuts in school services.
The
question for the corporate agenda, promoted by the Chamber of Commerce among others is can the economy prosper with a poorly
educated work force. California
grew and prospered from 1970- 1994 based upon a well educated work force. Then, in the 1994-2008 period over $10
billion of tax cuts were passed – making the current crisis much worse. This week we learned that Apple, and other corporations, are avoiding over $10 billion in taxes by moving one small office to Nevada. California suffers from a decade of corporate tax cuts and public disinvestment. Today, instead of following the education approach, conservative anti tax forces have imposed an Mississippi
approach on California.
California public schools are in
crisis- and they are getting worse. This is a direct result of massive budget
cuts imposed by the legislature and the governor in the last four years. Total per pupil expenditure is down by
over $1,000 per student. The result- massive class size increases. Students are in often classes too large
for learning. Supplementary
services such as tutoring and art classes have been eliminated. Over 14,000 teachers have been dismissed,
and thousands more face lay offs this fall. This is not the fault of teachers.
Wednesday, May 02, 2012
Faculty Union at CSU authorizes state wide strike
Faculty Union in California votes to authorize a
strike. Would be the first system wide strike in state history.
California State
University faculty voted to
approved a measure to give their union leaders the power to authorize a
strike next fall that could delay the beginning of school for thousands of
students across the 23-campus university system. The CSU is the 23 campus system of California. The University of California does not
have a faculty union with collective bargaining recognition although some of its
staff and employees belong to unions.
A powerful 95% of the faculty voters agreed that the CSU’s instructional faculty,
should initiate rolling walkouts if the CSU administration continues to demand
concessions.
Equally as impressive was the turnout, with 70%
of CFA members voting to send an unmistakable message to Chancellor Charles B.
Reed – state austerity is killing higher education in California.
Lillian Taiz, president of the California Faculty
Association, said, “Today, the faculty has spoken loud and clear – we have had
enough of the way in which they are being treated by the CSU administration.”
Labels:
austerity,
California,
California budget crisis,
CFA,
faculty union,
Strike
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)