Friday, December 29, 2023

We have Seen Nothing Like the Siege of Gaza

 

We Are No Strangers to Human Suffering, but We’ve Seen Nothing Like the Siege of Gaza

https://portside.org/2023-12-12/we-are-no-strangers-human-suffering-weve-seen-nothing-siege-gaza
Portside Date: 
Author: Michelle Nunn, Tjada D’Oyen McKenna, Jan Egeland, Abby Maxman, Jeremy Konyndyk and Janti Soeripto

We are no strangers to human suffering — to conflict, to natural disasters, to some of the world’s largest and gravest catastrophes. We were there when fighting erupted in Khartoum, Sudan. As bombs rained down on Ukraine. When earthquakes leveled southern Turkey and northern Syria. As the Horn of Africa faced its worst drought in years. The list goes on.

But as the leaders of some of the world’s largest global humanitarian organizations, we have seen nothing like the siege of Gaza. In the more than two months since the horrifying attack on Israel that killed more than 1,200 people and resulted in some 240 abductions, about 18,000 Gazans — including more than 7,500 children — have been killed, according to the Gazan health ministry. More children have been reported killed in this conflict than in all major global conflicts combined last year.

The atrocities committed by Hamas on Oct. 7 were unconscionable and depraved, and the taking and holding of hostages is abhorrent. The calls for their release are urgent and justified. But the right to self-defense does not and cannot require unleashing this humanitarian nightmare on millions of civilians. It is not a path to accountability, healing or peace. In no other war we can think of in this century have civilians been so trapped, without any avenue or option to escape to save themselves and their children.

Most of our organizations have been operating in Gaza for decades. But we can do nothing remotely adequate to address the level of suffering there without an immediate and complete cease-fire and an end to the siege. The aerial bombardments have rendered our jobs impossible. The withholding of water, fuel, food and other basic goods has created an enormous scale of need that aid alone cannot offset.

Global leaders — and especially the United States government — must understand that we cannot save lives under these conditions. A significant change in approach from the U.S. government is needed today to pull Gaza back from this abyss.

For a start, the Biden administration must stop its diplomatic interference at the United Nations, blocking calls for a cease-fire.

Since the pause in fighting ended, we are again witnessing an exceptionally high level of bombardment, and at increasing ferocity. The few areas left in Gaza that are untouched by bombardment are shrinking by the hour, forcing more and more civilians to seek safety that does not exist. Over 80 percent of 2.3 million Gazans are now displaced. The newest Israeli offensive is now forcing them to cluster on a tiny sliver of land.

The bombardment is not the only thing brutally cutting lives short. The siege of — and blockades surrounding — Gaza have led to a critical food scarcity, cutoffs of medical supplies and electricity, and a lack of clean water. There is barely any medical care to be found in the enclave and few medications. Surgeons are working by the light of their mobile phones, without anesthetics. They are using dishcloths as bandages. The risk of waves of waterborne and infectious disease will only grow in the increasingly overcrowded living conditions of the displaced.

One of our colleagues in Gaza recently described their struggle to feed an orphaned infant who had been rescued from the rubble of an airstrike. The baby had not eaten for days after her mother’s death. Colleagues could only scrounge up powdered milk — not formula, not breast milk, and not a nutritionally suitable infant food — to help stave off her starvation.

Today our staff members are not safe. They tell us they’re making the daily choice of staying with their families in one place so that they can die together or go out to seek water and food.

Among leaders in Washington, there is constant talk about preparing for the “day after.” But if this relentless bombardment and siege continue, there will be no “day after” for Gaza. It will be too late. Hundreds of thousands of lives hang in the balance today.

Thursday, December 28, 2023

Media: Stop Normalizing Fascism and Trump

RS Seminar- Economic Crisis: Media: Stop Normalizing Fascism and Trump:   Robert Reich: Media; Stop normalizing fascism.     4 min.              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xds9WDUd1yc  

Wednesday, December 27, 2023

Save AMERICAN RIVER Trees

URGENT!  



Another stretch of our beautiful Wild and Scenic American River is at huge risk!

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has multiple “bank erosion” projects in progress (photos below show current work near Sac State). 

  • Contract “3B” is coming to the pristine areas east (upstream) of Howe/Watt all the way to Rio Bravo/Mayhew

  • Over 500 trees are planned to be bulldozed (may include beloved heritage oaks)

  • Massive damage done to the American River Parkway and wildlife habitat

  • More destruction than actual levee upgrades completed a decade ago

  • This new project would bring the total damaged area of the wildlife corridor to 11 miles out of the lower 26 miles of the Parkway! 

  • Despite the American River being a national and state Wild and Scenic River and portions designated as a “Protected Area” in the American River Parkway Plan, the USACE plans to move forward with the project . 

  • With more than 5 million visits annually to the American River Parkway, which is more than Yosemite, the project will diminish our parkway’s beauty and   recreational values.

    See photos and details here.

    www.americanrivertrees.org


Friday, December 22, 2023

Monday, December 18, 2023

Donald Trump and the Threat to U.S. Democracy

 

It’s not too late to preserve American democracy—yet

Let’s start with a thought experiment: A candidate for president is asked to reassure voters that he has no plans to abuse his power, break the law or use the government to go after people. The answer is a no-brainer, right? Of course, this isn’t a thought experiment; it’s the exact question Fox News host Sean Hannity recently posed to Donald Trump, to which Trump replied that he would be a “dictator,” but only on “day one.” Many in his party shrugged off the statement or dismissed it as a joke. Americans may be desensitized to Trump’s words, even when he says he would be a dictator, given the maelstrom of shocking statements he makes. But he has doubled down on this troubling declaration—the latest in a pattern of his authoritarian leanings.


Weingarten, center, with voters in Pittsburgh at an AFT Votes event on Nov. 2, 2022.

Trump has talked about suspending the United States Constitution, invoking the Insurrection Act to mobilize the U.S. armed forces to suppress legitimate protests, weaponizing the government to retaliate against his political enemies, bringing treason charges against news organizations, and vowing to be the MAGA movement’s “retribution.” So we have no choice but to take him at his word.

Trump has a pressing motivation—beyond vengeance or grievance—to put himself above the law: self-protection. He faces 91 felony counts in four criminal cases in Florida, Georgia, New York and Washington, which carry a total of roughly 700 years in jail time if convicted. And a $250 million civil fraud case in New York threatens his business empire.

In a second term, Trump would have a better understanding of how to overcome the institutional safeguards against his corrupt intentions, including, presumably, stopping all federal and state cases against him. Whereas he previously was restrained by officials who put the rule of law and the good of the country above fealty to the president, plans are being laid to stack the government with loyalists, hardliners, sycophants and willing enablers should he return to office.

Last month, Trump echoed language used by dictators, comparing his political opponents to “vermin.” Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a historian at New York University, notes that “calling people ‘vermin’ was used effectively by Hitler and Mussolini to dehumanize people and encourage their followers to engage in violence.”

Similarly, he understands how to exert control through fear of violence. Sen. Mitt Romney and former Rep. Liz Cheney have both said that Republican colleagues told them they wanted to vote against Trump in the Jan. 6 impeachment trial but did not because of fear for their and their families’ safety.

Such fears are understandable. Just consider the type of content Trump posts on his Truth Social platform. In a message attacking Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Trump wrote, “He has a DEATH WISH,” which many viewed as a threat. Trump also shared a message of a supporter encouraging violence on Trump’s behalf; the supporter wrote that he would “physically fight for [Trump]” and “we Are Locked and LOADED.” Numerous prosecutors, lawyers and judges in cases involving Trump have received death threats after Trump railed against them.

As 2023 closes, I would have loved to devote this column to looking back on the year. No doubt there is division and anxiety in the country, but there is so much good as well. The AFT has given out 9.8 million books to children, families and educators through the AFT’s Reading Opens the World campaign and our partnership with First Book. Our Real Solutions for Kids and Communities campaign is taking on learning loss, loneliness and literacy challenges by pressing for solutions like wraparound services, community schools, the science of reading approach and hands-on learning. Our Code Red campaign is helping to secure safe patient limits and support health professionals. And our work to help AFT members reduce or eliminate their student debt is on track to provide nearly $400 million in savings for our members.

The AFT is focused on helping people thrive—that’s the purpose of the labor movement and of public education. But for working people and our families, for people not born to wealth or power, the ability to thrive depends on pluralism and democracy. That’s why, as a union leader, a social studies teacher and an American, I feel compelled to sound this alarm and commit to doing everything I can to safeguard democracy against the gravest threat since the Civil War. The next presidential election is less than a year away. If Trump is the Republican nominee, the election will become an existential referendum on whether the United States will remain a democracy or risks becoming a dictatorship. It is not yet too late. 

Download the Column (263.15 KB)

Sunday, December 17, 2023

The Rise and Fall of Moms For Liberty

The Rise and Fall of Moms For Liberty: Reeling from school board losses, the “parental rights” organization is collapsing on itself, writes Maurice Cunningham.

Monday, December 11, 2023

Time to Call BS- anti semitism

Time to Call BS: Today on TAP: The Trumpian Right discovered antisemitism only when it needed a cudgel to bash the Ivies.

Wealthy Donors and Universities

 

When wealthy donors oust university presidents over how they answer congressional questions

A frighteningly dangerous precedent

[Rep. Elise Stefanik]

Friends,

America’s prestigious universities play a big role in determining who gets into America’s wealthy elite. 

A degree from Harvard, Penn, or M.I.T., to take three examples, is a meal ticket to a lucrative job on Wall Street or a corporate law firm and to the richest and most influential people in the land. 

But as America becomes increasingly stratified by wealth, those tickets are easily abused. 

Universities that give preference in admissions to the children or grandchildren of major donors serve to widen inequality even further. 

Universities that allow major donors to influence what is taught or expressed on campus could be seen to suppress ideas that threaten the wealthy — which could chill freedom of expression and fuel social resentment.

Which brings us to the latest imbroglio. 

Last Tuesday, the presidents of the University of Pennsylvania, Harvard, and M.I.T. tried to give precise answers to questions from members of Congress about whether their university cultures had encouraged hostility towards Jews — hostility that has surged since Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel and Israel’s attack on Gaza in response. 

In their opening remarks, all three denied it, and repeatedly condemned antisemitism. 

Then Elise Stefanik, a Republican representative from New York (and herself a Harvard graduate) asked a yes or no question: would calls for genocide of Jews on campus violate their codes of conduct or harassment policies? 

The presidents hedged. “If the speech turns into conduct, yes, it can be harassment,” Penn’s president, M. Elizabeth Magill, a former dean of Stanford Law School, replied in lawyer-like fashion. 

“I’m asking if specifically calling for the genocide of Jews — does that constitute bullying or harassment?” Stefanik pressed her point. 

“If it is directed and severe or pervasive, it is harassment,” said Magill.

“So the answer is yes?” 

“It is a context-dependent decision, congresswoman,” Magill said.

Faced with the same question, Harvard’s president, Claudine Gay, also temporized. “It can be,” she said, “depending on the context.” 

The university presidents should have answered unambiguously and unequivocally that calls for genocide of any group are intolerable. 

Their failure to do so has fueled a firestorm. 

Ross Stevens, a hedge fund manager, said he would withdraw a $100 million gift to Penn. Other wealthy Penn donors called for Magill to resign. 

Even prior to the hearing, a campaign had been launched by some of Wall Street’s most powerful figures to oust all three university presidents for failing to adequately condemn Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel.

The influential board of advisers of Penn’s Wharton School’s, chaired by Marc Rowan of Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest private equity firms, called on alumni to withhold donations to Penn. 

The billionaire investor Bill Ackman, Harvard alumnus and head of New York hedge fund Pershing Square Capital Management, called for the three university presidents to be fired. 

The day after their testimony, Magill and Gay issued statements in efforts to contain the damage. 

But on Saturday evening, after an emergency meeting of Penn’s board of trustees, Magill resigned under pressure. 

Over the weekend, calls from donors for Harvard’s Claudine Gay to resign grew louder, as prominent donors demanded her ouster, too. 

I can well understand the anger and frustration of these donors. In their congressional testimony, the university presidents should have been clearer that their institutions do not tolerate calls for genocide. Period. 

But to use their power as major donors to force or seek the ouster of these presidents is almost as repugnant as the failures of these presidents to unambiguously condemn calls for genocide. It endangers the autonomy of America’s universities. 

Who’s kidding whom? Those of us who have spent our lifetimes teaching in prestigious universities are well aware of the influence of big donors. The major job of today’s university presidents is to solicit money, and their largest targets are typically denizens of Wall Street. 

For the same reason, boards of trustees are packed with wealthy alumni, often from the Street, who routinely veto candidates for university presidentships harboring views they find offensive. 

But not until now have major donors so brazenly used their financial influence to hound presidents out of office for failing to come out as clearly as the donors would like on an issue of campus speech or expression. 

As a Jew, I cannot help but worry, too, that the actions of these donors will fuel the very antisemitism they claim to oppose — based on the perilous stereotype of wealthy Jewish bankers controlling the world.

...
Editorial note. This is as good of a reason as possible to support public funded universities.

Saturday, December 09, 2023

Cease Fire Now

 


The U.S. veto of the UN Security Council Resolution calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza gives a green light for Israel to continue escalating a murderous military campaign that has reached genocidal proportions in Gaza. 

This is wrong and the U.S. now stands visibly isolated on the world stage. And our government’s stubborn refusal to help put the brakes on what U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres termed a “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza is not just wrong, it is immoral.

It not only makes us complicit with every atrocity committed by the IDF, it unnecessarily puts us on a collision course with history and people around the world who should be our friends and allies. 

For decades the U.S. has used its Security Council veto power to protect Israel from the consequences of its own excesses – like the invasion of Lebanon in the 1980’s, the use of prohibited weapons, decades of settlement on illegally occupied lands – the list is long.  Israel has become accustomed to virtually unconditional U.S. backing, but this week’s veto is perhaps the most bitter one yet.

Over 17,000 people have been killed in weeks of brutal and indiscriminate strikes on Gaza in what Israel justifies as retaliation for the brutal October 7th attacks by Hamas. All life is sacred, but the world is not buying Israel’s story. Not when nearly half those killed in its military campaign are children, not when most of Gaza’s homes are already destroyed, not when more than a million internally displaced people fleeing the conflict go hungry, thirsty, unsheltered.

And the gruesome October 7th assault did not suddenly make the deeply corrupt, authoritarian ultra-nationalist Benjamin Netanyahu a wise leader who the U.S. should support even as he bombs and brutalizes the people of Gaza whose grandparents first fled there 1948 and who, since 1967, have lived under military occupation and domination by Israel. 

The shock of what happened on October 7th is undisputed, the lessons are not.  The U.S. is not obliged to follow Benjamin Netanyahu on an impossible campaign to “exterminate” his enemies. Joining the world in calling for a genuine and prolonged ceasefire is in the long-term best interests of the American people and of everyone involved. Violence begets more violence. New leaders who understand that are desperately needed.

In a statement explaining why he invoked the rarely used Article 99 of the U.N. Charter that empowers the Secretary-General “to bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which, in his opinion, may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security,” Guterres lamented the “appalling human suffering, physical destruction and collective trauma across Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory.” He said, “Hospitals have turned into battlegrounds [and that] without shelter or the essentials to survive, I expect public order to completely break down soon.”

The temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas that was abandoned on December 1st should resume. The exchange of captives should resume. The constant deadly bombardment of Gaza must stop; truce and ceasefire must be revived. 

Don’t let up the pressure on our leaders. Please tell the White House: Permanent Ceasefire NOW.  Call and express your disappointment on today’s ceasefire VETO. America can do better.

May peace prevail,

Wednesday, December 06, 2023

For a Ceasefire Now.

 Instead of heeding the demands of the American people for a ceasefire, Congress just passed a resolution trying to silence our anti-war movement. 

I voted against House Resolution 894, a dangerous Republican-led resolution that falsely claims it’s antisemitic to oppose the policies of Israel’s government. As Jewish Voice for Peace Action wrote about this resolution: 

“Conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism conflates all Jews with the Israeli state and endangers Jewish communities. Just as blaming all Jews for Israel's actions is antisemitic, so is the inverse: suggesting that Jewish people are synonymous with Israel and Zionism.”

The resolution endangers Jews, Palestinians, and people of all backgrounds who are speaking up for Palestinians’ human rights. It violates our constitutional right to free speech, and it ignores the very real threat of white supremacy that’s fueling an interconnected rise in antisemitism, Islamophobia, and anti-Arab hate. 

Please add your name if you agree: Criticizing Israel’s government is not antisemitic. No government is beyond criticism, and we will continue speaking up for human rights around the world. 

I grieve the lives of every innocent civilian killed and harmed in Palestine and Israel. I’m also horrified by the increase in violence against Jewish Americans, Arab Americans, and Muslim Americans.

My colleagues in Congress are fueling this violence by dehumanizing Palestinians and passing resolutions like HR 894, which falsely conflates Jews with Israel’s government and condemns Jewish peace advocates as “rioters.”

Rather than endangering our communities and attacking our First Amendment rights, members of Congress should be listening to their constituents. 

A new poll again confirms that most U.S. voters support a permanent ceasefire in Gaza—and most voters think the U.S. should “only provide military aid to Israel if they meet our standards for human rights.”1

But Congress continues to ignore the American people. Right now, the Senate is getting ready to vote on sending $14 billion more U.S. taxpayer dollars to fund Israel’s military without conditions. 

Meanwhile, the Republicans with a majority in the House of Representatives continue to repeat white supremacist conspiracy theories that harm all marginalized groups. We are safest when we build cross-cultural solidarity and push back against oppressive systems that harm all of us.

I will continue to push back against hate, dehumanization, and oppression. I will continue to build a world where all of us live with safety, equality, freedom, and dignity.

Add your name: Opposing the policies of Israel’s government is NOT antisemitic. Our freedom to criticize governments is a core part of the U.S. Constitution, and we will continue speaking out against oppression. 

In solidarity,

Rashida

Monday, December 04, 2023

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.