Bill Fletcher
Organizing is incredibly hard
work. And it’s messy work. And the liberal elite, including most union leaders,
are constantly investing in everything but deep organizing. The real reason we
lost in Wisconsin is the same reason that progressives have been on a four
decade decline in the US: it’s because of a deep and long-term turn away from
organizing and education and towards something that more resembles mobilizing.
Organizing expands our base by keeping our energy and resources focused on the
undecideds, and on developing the organic leaders in our workplaces and
communities so that they become part of an expanding pool of unpaid organizers.
Mobilizing focuses on the people who are already with us and replaces organic
leadership development with paid staff. That and the split between “labor” and
“social movements” account for the failure of progressive politics, the loss in
Wisconsin, the ever shrinking public sphere, and the unabashed rule of the
worst kinds of corporate greed.
The work we are describing isn’t an election 2012 program, it’s
not a 12 month program; it must happen every day, every month and every year.
It’s ongoing. Workers are every bit courageous enough and smart enough, but
they experience a lifetime of being told they are not worthy, not smart, and
not deserving. In other words, sit down, shut up and listen. Unions have to
challenge this paradigm, not reinforce it.
When conservatives suffered their
own strategic defeat and lost the election in 1964—by much larger margins than
the recall in Wisconsin—they didn’t say, “well, no point trying.” They instead
built for the long haul and in 1980 it paid off with Reagan.
http://talkingunion.wordpress.com/2012/07/07/there-is-no-substitute-for-organizing-how-unions-might-help-win-future-battles/#more-15596
No comments:
Post a Comment